Why is Obama (the “peace candidate”) already bombing Pakistan?

by: admin Saturday, May 1st, 2010





Truth about islam

« | Home | »

15 Responses to “Why is Obama (the “peace candidate”) already bombing Pakistan?”

Liberal AssKicker Said:

It’s very likely that he had no idea what was ordered.

At least try to be fair.

(For the uninformed, a US drone dropped a payload in Pakistan, killing 10 people.)

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 6:22 pm
nirv Said:

either solid link , or you are certified liar..

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 7:03 pm
Formerly Fed up American Said:

Oh, so NOW you are concerned?

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 7:43 pm
lv_consultant Said:

if you are going to try to bash Obama at least get it right…Predator drones fire missiles they do not drop bombs..

and in case you just woke up from a 7 year slumber. they are targeting senior Al Qaeda members who are hiding in Pakistan. you do remember 9-11 don’t you?

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 8:42 pm
Stephanie is pretty happy today Said:

Pakistan is a nation that supports terrorism.

See they actually support terrorism, Obama doesn’t just make that up like Bush did when he wanted to invade Iraq.

Justified war is different from what Bush did, it is not the same thing at all. I mean I don’t like Obama, but really logically there is a difference.

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 9:14 pm
slykitty62 Said:

At no point did Obama say he was for peace. He said we needed to get out of Iraq and take the fight where it should have been all along, Afghanistan and Pakistan, where Osama is hiding.

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 9:22 pm
bmovies60 Said:

“Predator drones fire missiles they do not drop bombs..”

I’m sure the ones who are being bombed are greatful for your accuracy.

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 9:58 pm
☼♥ Said:

Last night John McCain accused Barack Obama of, among other things, having “once suggested bombing our ally, Pakistan.” This is a lie.

The basis for it is a foreign policy address Obama made last August, in which he said:

I understand that President Musharraf has his own challenges. But let me make this clear. There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al Qaeda leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.

Obama was clearly referencing a New York Times story from the previous month, describing how the administration had actionable intelligence about senior al Qaeda leaders, and planned a snatch-and-grab mission, but aborted it at the last second. As the Times reported, “The decision to halt the planned “snatch and grab” operation frustrated some top intelligence officials and members of the military’s secret Special Operations units, who say the United States missed a significant opportunity to try to capture senior members of Al Qaeda.”

Further in the same spech, Obama offered a little more detail about the kind of anti-terrorist mission he envisions:

I will not hesitate to use military force to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to America. This requires a broader set of capabilities, as outlined in the Army and Marine Corps’s new counter-insurgency manual. I will ensure that our military becomes more stealth, agile, and lethal in its ability to capture or kill terrorists. We need to recruit, train, and equip our armed forces to better target terrorists, and to help foreign militaries to do the same.

There is nothing in Obama’s speech, or any other Obama speech, about “bombing” Pakistan. Both implicitly and explicitly, he called for small, Special Operations-type incursions.

Meanwhile, you know who is coming closer to “bombing an ally”? The Bush administration, whose determined prosecution of the war on terror McCain continues to tout. The Washington Post reported — as it happens, the same day McCain made his smear — that the CIA launched Hellfire missiles at an al Qaeda operative in Pakistan. As the Post noted, “Having requested the Pakistani government’s official permission for such strikes on previous occasions, only to be put off or turned down, this time the U.S. spy agency did not seek approval.”

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 10:51 pm
Polymer Mark Said:

He is no different than any President before him. If his supporters think that he is anti-establishment, they are wrong. He is not fighting the man. He is the man.

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 11:42 pm
Mysterio Said:

That’s because there’s no difference between republicans and democrats.

Comment made on May 1st, 2010 at 11:49 pm
Fozzy Said:

Screw the world.. if there are terrorist leaders anywhere in the world, they should be killed as publicly and harshly as possible..

And on a side note; How does someone so clueless become a top contributor?

Comment made on May 2nd, 2010 at 12:46 am
A Republicrat Said:

Yes, Obama will continue the same interventionist foreign policy that has plagued us for decades under many Republicratic tenures.

Comment made on May 2nd, 2010 at 12:57 am
Captain Starkiller Said:

Because he is interested in stopping terrorism.

Obama has already reached out to the Muslim world and seems to be interested in human rights for all. He has said in the past that if need be, he would send troops into Pakistan to stop fighting in Afghanistan. He has never said he would not do otherwise.

Comment made on May 2nd, 2010 at 12:58 am
delphi Said:

He said he was going to focus on Afghanistan and Pakistan. You should have feigned concern when an innocent country was invaded and occupied.

Comment made on May 2nd, 2010 at 1:46 am
Lou B Said:

Everything you state is 100% correct It is wrong to bomb in Pakistan, and if Obama is aware of this incident, it is his first major blunder.

Here are several quotes by Einstein which pertain to this situation:
“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding”.
It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.
“The world will not evolve past its current state of crisis by using the same thinking that created the situation.”

A military solution to every problem is not the answer.
Especially when the US should mind it own business.

Comment made on May 2nd, 2010 at 2:15 am
 

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes